From AnonymousLiberal.com:
This is the first post I’ve written since last November. Part of what drove me to take a break from writing about politics was a growing realization that the Great Conversation in this country had completely ceased, that the various sides were no longer speaking the same language, like dialects that have–over time–drifted so far apart that they are no longer mutually intelligible. Watching Fox News and Tea Party rallies, it became apparent to me that the right wing in this country had severed the few remaining ties it had to the world I live in, the empirical world.
In its place, the Right has constructed its own Bubble World, a sort of political Truman Show complete with its own facts and rules (albeit facts and rules that are constantly changing based on political expediency). The writers, directors, and actors in this conservative version of Seahaven are the legions of GOP politicians, operatives, and conservative media outlets that relentlessly push this politically expedient alternative reality, and the Trumans are the millions of regular Americans who don’t realize the joke is on them.
In this Bubble World, it is an accepted truth that our President is a bumbling ignoramus who can only string together a coherent sentence if he uses a teleprompter (which, apparently, other politicians don’t use). I can understand a world in which Obama’s political opponents mock him as a being too professorial or out-of-touch or arrogant. But unintelligent? Inarticulate? I don’t know how to deal with that. It’s like mocking John Boehner for being pale.
Similarly, it is an accepted fact in the Bubble World that Obama is an extreme liberal, if not an outright socialist or communist. According to Newt Gingrich, Obama is “the most radical president in American history.” Again, I just don’t know how to deal with that. This is a guy who, at every point in his political career, has gone out of his way to position himself as a moderate, as a pragmatic technocrat. Since taking office, he has not, as far as I can tell, made a single policy decision that can fairly be described as liberal, much less radical. The only significant pieces of legislation he’s passed are a stimulus package that nearly every economist endorsed and a health care reform bill modeled on Romney-care (which, while better than nothing, is nowhere close to the kind of bill most liberals–much less a communists or socialists–would have crafted).
In Bubble World, there is a movement known as the Tea Party, whose members are simultaneously incensed about the size of the deficit and the fact that they have to pay taxes (even though they have the lowest tax rates in the free world and just got significant tax cuts–from Obama–in the past year). Moreover, they’re not angry at the party that built the deficit–by starting wars and giving massive tax cuts to people who are much richer than them–or that presided, just recently, over the near collapse of the economy. But they are furious at the party that just recently took the reins, inheriting both a crumbling economy and massive deficit. And if they had their way, they would put back in power a party whose only policy idea is, that’s right, cutting taxes; which, of course, would only make the deficit much worse.
But not in Bubble World. In Bubble World, cutting taxes actually raises revenue. In Bubble World, “the market” will magically solve all of our health care problems and true “freedom” is defined by one’s ability to be denied health coverage for pre-existing conditions. And in Bubble World, a set of sensible and long-overdue financial regulations designed to prevent another meltdown of the economy and foreclose any future taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street is actually a “permanent bailout bill.”
In this alternative universe, the facts are literally whatever the political consultants say they should be. Whatever resonates with the focus group. If you’re working on behalf of Wall Street lobbyists to kill a bill that would impose more accountability on Wall Street, you simply accuse those who support the bill of doing Wall Street’s bidding. It doesn’t matter that this is the opposite of the truth and is, in fact, exactly what you’re doing. While these facts might matter to people in the empirical world, the facts in Bubble World are whatever the right wing wants them to be. In Bubble World, Mitch McConnell is bravely protecting the people from the Wall Street bigwigs, not doing the bidding of Wall Street lobbyists.
And that sad reality goes a long way toward explaining why I haven’t been blogging lately. We’ve reached a point where the right wing in this country has achieved complete epistemic closure. Aided by their extensive and growing media apparatus and a traditional media that is uninterested in playing umpire, the Right has managed to escape entirely from the gravitational pull of the empirical world, and in fact, has a created a world of its own, one with a rapidly growing gravitational field that, everyday, pulls in more and more of the unsuspecting and uninformed.
From the comfort of this Bubble World, people like Mitch McConnell can simply say whatever the hell they want to say, no matter how ludicrous, and trust that much of the country will readily accept it as true. As Christof famously says in the Truman Show, “we accept the reality with which we are presented.” And that’s particularly true when that reality is one that is focus-grouped tested to conform with our pre-existing biases and hammered home repeatedly by the folks we rely on to keep us informed (which, for a scary number of people these days, means Fox News and Rush Limbaugh).
From my perch back in the empirical world, I’m just not sure how to deal with this. How do you begin to make your case when there aren’t any mutually accepted facts? How do you convince someone that the people they trust are liars and charlatans? Writing posts trying to correct the record and dispel misinformation can at times feel about as pointless as trying to bail water out of the ocean.
I had high hopes after the thumping the Republicans took in 2006 and 2008 that we had finally turned a corner, that the cracks were beginning to show in Bubble World and the empirical world was slowly re-exerting its influence. I got the feeling that more and more people who had been stuck in the bubble were beginning to sense that something just wasn’t right.
But I was wrong. Freed from the burden of any actual governing responsibility, the GOP has been free to devote all of its efforts to reconstructing their Bubble World. And they’ve been largely successful. An entire movement has formed that is based, almost entirely, on confusion and mis-directed anger, a movement that sees the world only through the lens of Fox News and other right wing outlets. The Tea Party is an army of Trumans, a movement of people who have whole-heartedly embraced the false reality with which they’ve been presented.
The central dilemma for those us left in the empirical world is how to puncture the bubble. What can we do to make facts once again relevant? What can be done to dis-incentivize the kind of lying and reality denial that has become the hallmark of the modern conservative movement? I can’t say that I have answers to these questions, but I’m pretty confident that these are THE questions that we should be asking. Policy debates are great, but only when they take place in the empirical world. If a majority of Americans aren’t living in that world, then such debates risk becoming purely academic exercises. Link to article…
The full article from an Obama-supportin’ conservative’s (Andrew Sullivan) point of view:
Victory
21 Mar 2010 11:15 pm
Obama’s historic breakthrough just passed 219 – 212. My take here. Stay tuned for reax. Now watch the narrative shift again. Sprung:
The flip side of Obama’s perhaps naive belief that he can win Republicans over is his ability to show them up. Americans are confused about the plan, but they are not confused about the man. By large margins they trust Obama more than they do the Republicans to produce rational solutions to the country’s problems. In the past month, he exploited his mastery of policy detail, his pragmatism, his focus on effectively alleviating the suffering he spotlighted, and his willingness to stake his political future on getting this bill passed to the utmost. The full eloquence and passion of the campaign came back to his lips in forum after forum and speech after speech.
To Democratic legislators, his message was that this bill epitomized why they had sought public office and why they were Democrats; it was the raison d’etre for their careers; in effect, passing it was worth their careers (and would make or break his own). In the bipartisan summit, he framed a core contrast: the Democrats would rein in the health insurers’ worst practices; the Republicans would further enable them by weakening existing regulations. In rallies, he emphasized human suffering caused by leaving people uninsured and underinsured and enumerated the bill’s benefits for ordinary people. As noted before, too, he presented the effort as a litmus test as to whether the Federal government was capable of taking meaningful action to solve national problems. He moved the needle of public opinion enough to move enough House Democrats to “yes.”
The process may have been frustrating, and long, and ugly, as Obama told the crowd at George Mason on Friday. But it was also glorious. Obama has been telling crowds since 2007 that change wasn’t going to be easy, but that it was possible with focus and persistence and courage. He just proved it.
(Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty.)
Permalink :: Trackback (0) :: Sphere It! :: Share This
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c45669e20120a960f33b970b
More changes coming…
So, once again, it’s been a while since I’ve posted anything here. It’s not that I haven’t thought about it. It’s just that I’ve been engaged in the process of building websites for several weeks now and just haven’t been feeling the need to post stuff on this after spending all day in the back end of WordPress sites. But, after taking a look today I guess I am feeling some of the compulsion that drives my writing in this forum. And I think it’s because I have some visions for the future of this site that will bring it along quite a ways from its humble beginnings, and I hope that change will be not too far off in the future.
In short, I intend to re-shape this site into a site that features my visual art in addition to all these other things I apparently consider worth posting for whoever visits here to see. Finding the pathways to utilize my talents and follow my interests has been the primary focus of my thoughts for many moons, and without question the medium of visual art has always held a prominent place in that search. So perhaps it’s just coincidence, but the skills I have been gaining by building websites have directly affected my artistic currents. I can often gauge the onset of artistic activity in my mind by some of the wide swings in my sleep patterns. And that’s definitely been happening lately. So… guess we’ll see where it goes. Always an adventure.
Creating this site has been a sincere opening for me. It’s been a conduit for discovery of my own hopes for utilizing my talents in their “highest and best use.” All I can say is that sometimes it’s a long journey to find that. But somehow that very journey is what feeds your passion and your understanding and your very ability to express something in an artistic form that maybe has a chance of capturing and, dare I say, addressing the emotions such long journeys can cultivate. Indeed, that’s where the art of the long road has its own unique connection with those who choose to engage.
With that in mind, give this a listen for a few:
Sometimes these songs just come along at the right moments. And as music has its own way of carrying me in particular, even in this seemingly contemplative moment I feel some of the original Fleetwood Mac comin’ on:
About this great British blues player, the great B.B. King was once quoted as saying Peter had “more talent in his little toe than I have in my whole body.”
So, here’s to talent. Finding it within yourself and taking it to its highest levels.
From Andrew Sullivan:
I watched the PBS documentary about the artist Emile Norman tonight… and I was so impressed I’m hard-pressed for words at the moment.
I was so pleased to see how this artist and his partner Brooks Clement made a life together in Big Sur during a time in American history when minorities were often treated deplorably. And clearly, being gay was one of the worst minorities one could be. They defied the prevailing winds and somehow between the two of them they managed to create an artistic dream there in those marvelous hills overlooking the ocean.
Before seeing this documentary I had heard of Emile Norman— somewhere, but I wasn’t sure from where. Maybe it’s just that I had tread some of the same ground, anywhere from the Masonic Temple in San Francisco to the Big Sur beaches and mountains. Or maybe it was Carmel, or who knows? I know I had heard of him, but as usual after learning more I came to know how tremendously much I did NOT know.
As an artist-in-training, as I generally consider myself, I so connected with one particular aspect of the story of Emile Norman that seemed worth pondering on my own to a greater extent. This was the seemingly endless inspiration Emile derived from his natural surroundings, whether in Big Sur or in Africa or in Italy or wherever. But specifically, I found myself thinking about my own regular sorties out into the natural world here in northern California. I, too, have seen so many inspiring moments. I’ve seen so many materials in nature that draw me in with their magical properties and structural complexities… with their magnificent simplicity too. And yet it’s only been stones that I’ve picked up (and maybe a few shells) from some particular moments on these outlying adventures. It crossed my mind just tonight how in the field of visual art I’ve kept far too limited of a palate. These materials are all around me and, just as Emile saw them this way, their properties carry their powers of beauty and inspiration in a broad spectrum of applications whether kept in their original state or not. Their properties remain whether they are in the sawdust, or in the crushed glass, or in the brilliant varieties of wood and other materials that surround us every day.
I found it exciting and inspiring to think about that. The powers of these ingredients are such a significant component, and I cannot deny that I feel as though they are illuminated to me at this very moment in a renewed way.
And as one who persistently ignores the television since it so often sucks so freakin’ massively, I found once again something spectacular on PBS. Once again it really was enriching. And obviously, I felt it was worth tapping out a few lines about that. 
Hope you get a chance to check out the artwork of Emile Norman, and I hope you have the luxury of taking time to dig into this artist’s life a little deeper than usual.
Hopefully Brooks found Emile “a spot in the art department” in heaven.
It’s been a while since I’ve posted anything new that I’ve written. (Is this where I’m supposed to say Forgive me Father, for I have sinned?) So I awoke in the middle of the night and felt I might write something. And as I picked up a new pen my uncle made for me with beautifully polished wooden cylinders making up the instrument, the words below came. Seemed worth posting something finally…
Midnight dreams awakened in the stillness Polished wood and metal Both grow warm in my hand over time, like meditation stones Tree rings of ages past Drought, flood, summer heat Growth spurts, blossoms and wilts Hopes, and guilts Partly to blame Partly to claim Awake in the nest it was Midnight still, paper and a new quillI believe FDR knew what time it was:
See here for the article where I viewed this video.